Zack Snyder, much like bees to honey, seems to attract controversy wherever he goes. But, unlike embattled celebrities who may deserve it, Zack's controversies are mostly tied to his films, which have often divided movie fans online. This brings us to the latest bone of contention - just how profitable were Zack Snyder's films under Warner Bros.?
One Twitter (or should we say X?) user, @DavidPoland, decided to start an online war of words on the profitability of the Snyderverse, claiming: It's always funny to me that supporters conveniently forget how much money Zack Snyder lost for WB. Big hit with 300. Then they handed him DC and he didn't lose much money there… or build a big winner. But 3 or 4 losers in between.
Bro Power. As expected, his argument roped in all kinds of people, with numerous individuals coming to Snyder's defense. But what was particularly interesting was former Warner Bros. executive Greg Silverman's response to this opinion. The producer who once served as President, Creative Development and Worldwide Production at Warner Bros. Pictures refuted these claims, stating: Not true. We lost some money on GAHOOLE and a fair amount on SUCKERPUNCH. The rest of his films at WB were very profitable. Very. https://twitter.com/gregsilverman/status/1686034340323667968


