In a world where the consumer expectations hinge on both value and functionality, Sony’s recent announcement of the PlayStation 5 Slim has sparked significant debate. As it stands, consumers eyeing to get this sleeker model of the widely popular gaming console will be facing an unexpected expenditure. Sony’s declaration implies that if you want the new PS5 Slim to stand upright, you’ll have to delve deeper into your pocket.
Sony Interactive Entertainment’s official release marked the unveiling of this redesigned PlayStation 5 model. The catch, however, lies in the vertical orientation.
Unlike its outgoing predecessor, which had come equipped with a versatile stand accommodating both horizontal and vertical alignments, the PS5 Slim requires a separate purchase for those wanting a vertical display. A price tag of $29.99 or its regional equivalent awaits those opting for the ‘Vertical Stand’. But, to temper the disappointment, a horizontal stand will accompany the new model. It’s a seemingly subtle shift that has irked many fans.
Despite this seeming setback, the PS5 Slim doesn’t lack merit. This incoming console has undergone a physically marginal transformation, with its volume decreased by over 30% and weight reduced by between 18% to 24%, variant-dependent. Marking its debut in the US this November, both the standard and digital editions will feature a generous 1TB storage. Notably, Sony has offered an olive branch to digital-only purchasers with an optional Ultra HD Blu-ray Disc Drive add-on, a deviation from their earlier approach. However, this flexibility comes with a price tag, costing buyers an additional $79.99 or its regional equivalent.
It’s evident that Sony’s decision is not without precedent. Vertical stands for the PlayStation have been part of Sony’s offering since the days of PlayStation 2, 3, and 4. The present contention, however, is rooted in expectation. The original PS5 set a standard by including a dual-purpose stand, so this deviation, albeit in line with historical trends, has garnered attention.
But there’s more to this decision than just fiscal implications. The practicality of using the PS5 Slim vertically, without a designated stand, is fraught with risks. While some users argue that the original can stand on its own, the threat of a damaged game disc due to an unstable console is real and concerning. After all, electronics, especially of the calibre of the PS5, require delicate handling and stable positioning.
Naturally, critics haven’t held back in their assessment. Many feel the redesign, though sleeker, doesn’t bring enough to the table to justify the shift, especially when costs have either remained stagnant or, in some instances, risen. The idea that the console, despite being smaller, demands an extra expenditure for what was previously a bundled feature adds to the issue. While the aesthetics are arguably more streamlined, is it revolutionary enough to justify the shift, especially with costs remaining constant or, in some cases, even escalating?
Then again, some have accepted this as fact. After all, it’s not like Sony can prevent everyone else from making similar devices. Third-party manufacturers have long made profit off of market needs. As long as the demand is there, they’ll oblige. It’s not unusual for third-party offerings to improve on what’s available from the manufacturers. The fact that Sony has priced its standalone stand in a similar bracket as the multifunctional counterparts available for both the PlayStation 4 and the PlayStation 5 is both intriguing and telling.
How Sony responds (if at all) remains to be seen, but we can guarantee that it won’t budget at all. The backlash might not be enough to dissuade others from buying the $30 stand for the PS5 Slim, especially casual gamers who couldn’t care any less other than to get their dream console in time for the holiday season.
Speaking of dreams, many long for the release of a more powerful version of the PlayStation 5. If we believe the recent rumors, the PS5 Pro could be released in November 2024 with a potential reveal around this time next year.
