Backstage personnel are reportedly trying to "Vince Proof" the WWE

McMahon's approach to creative decision-making is well-established. His reign atop the WWE has included altering match orders, timing, and even adding quick, additional segments to the mix. A notable example was the transformation of Seth Rollins' World Heavyweight Championship open challenge on June 19th Raw, where the initially planned challenger, Finn Balor, attacked the Visionary instead of facing him in the ring.

The issue extends beyond the simple frustration of last-minute changes, highlighting the delicate balance between preserving the spirit of unpredictability inherent in wrestling and maintaining a level of stability that respects both talent and audience expectations.

In the face of this uncertainty, WWE talent continues to grapple with the unpredictable ebb and flow of McMahon's changes. They are forced to adapt, innovate, and maintain composure, knowing well that the game can change right up until the final bell.

Interestingly, while McMahon's influence has sparked frustration, some appreciate his commitment to "making good" on advertised matches. Even though some see this as a disruptive influence, others view it as McMahon's unique method of preserving the integrity of the programming.

This tumultuous period in WWE history is reminiscent of the wrestling world's unpredictable nature itself, a pendulum constantly swinging between chaos and order. As Money in the Bank in London and SummerSlam in Detroit approaches, the WWE universe will be watching closely, and regardless of the outcome, one can't deny the intrigue McMahon brings to the table.

Despite the challenges, the WWE remains a captivating spectacle, wrestling with its own unpredictability as much as the performers do within the ring.

As we anticipate the unfolding drama, we are reminded of the truth in the age-old adage - "the show must go on."