Game Mechanics That Developers Need To Stop Using

What might be envisioned as a change of pace, or a way to shake up the gameplay, are usually poorly implemented afterthoughts that clearly didn't get as much attention as the main mechanics did, and it always shows. In the end, these are just dreaded transitions players try to get through as soon as possible to return to the fun bits. If your main gameplay loop is good enough, you won't need to "shake things up" with a vehicle section; if it isn't, a forced vehicle section won't help.

Bonus (negative) points if they're on the rails, and start over from the very beginning if you die or fail. Forced Stealth Sections A close cousin of the forced vehicle section, the forced stealth section that is shoehorned into the middle of a game that otherwise doesn't rely on stealth is nothing but a source of frustration. No doubt forced stealth sections lead to several instances of players just quitting on a game halfway through - if we want to play a stealth game, we'll play a stealth game! They, without exception, pull off stealth better than a non-stealth game having a swing at it midway through.

Changes of pace are sometimes good and needed, but a sharp swerve into a completely different style is almost never well executed, and only serves to shatter immersion. If you've been a power-tripping badass exploding your way through henchmen, it'll take some awfully contrived reason to force you into sneaking for the sake of one mission. Force Rail-Shooter Sections The third member of this unholy trinity of forced gameplay changes, the rail-shooter is, from a purely technical standpoint, entirely reductive. All this achieves is relieving the player of a dimension of control. We have yet to encounter any forced rail-shooter sections that didn't detract from the overall experience, and these are the hardest to decipher.

Since they generally appear in shooter games, you're not actually doing anything different. If it is a method of padding, you could still implement a section that takes a fixed amount of time to complete without removing control from the player. It makes the least amount of sense of the forced-trifecta, and should definitely be abandoned first. Quick Time Events Quick time events, as a whole, are not necessarily a problem. Sticking them where they don't belong, however, is. If we want to get down to it, all rhythm games such as Guitar Hero or Rock Band revolve around an extended quick time event sequence, and we love these titles - because we know what we're getting into.

Often, quick time events are thrust into situations and contexts where they are annoying or just plain lazy. When you whittle down a boss' health bar, utilizing the skills that playing the game up until that point has taught you, it is nothing short of jarring to have to also clear a quick time event in a "cinematic" scene to progress.

Even more egregious is when important moments of the story get stinked up by QTEs - or revolve around them. Looking at you, Warhammer 40,000: Space Marine - finishing off the final boss with a QTE was a low blow, and an exceedingly anticlimactic end to an otherwise visceral game. Inventory Limits In some, rare cases, like survival games, inventory limits have a place. However, in the grand scheme of things, the mechanic lives in contradiction with itself. Games that impose inventory limits still do not place any measure of realistic limitation on the amount of items you can carry, so obviously immersion isn't the point - sure, my character can haul around 45 potions, 10 scrolls, 4 sets of full plate armor, 8 swords, 200 arrows and a bow, but picking up just one more battle axe will be too heavy. Totally relatable.

Imposing inventory limits and then offering ways to unlock - or, god forbid, buy - more inventory space is a poor way to offer incentive of progression. Rewards should be something you feel like is a bonus as opposed to an underlying convenience. Every time we start playing a new RPG, our first step is to look for an infinite inventory mod. Health Regeneration (Where it does not make sense) One of the worst tropes in modern video games has to be the health regeneration mechanic. The whole process of watching our character apparently projectile-bleed out of their eyeballs upon suffering damage, only to magically heal back to perfect health after cowering behind a chest-high wall or something is neither fun, nor immersive. Game mechanics usually have to be at least one or the other to be a logical choice to implement.

The whole realism argument flies out the window with the whole thing - sure, miracle health packs that instantly heal any and all injuries are also not realistic, but add an extra layer of strategy and difficulty. That covers the fun part, and since humans are unfortunately very fragile beings, "realistic" health mechanics wouldn't ever be quite fun now, would they? Call of Duty would be a wholly different experience if taking a single shot to the chest would cause your character to collapse on the floor in shock as a wheezing pile of pain and misery.

Now, when we're dealing with fantasy characters, or bring fictional technology into the mix, then regenerating health can make sense - it still won't be fun, though. Invisible Walls We understand a need to set boundaries in maps and open worlds. Be it at the edge of the game world, or cordoning off areas that players shouldn't be able to access until a later point in the story, there are plenty of more elegant ways to set up borders.

Mountains, walls, impassable shrubbery, fatal falls, locked doors - all of these methods are vastly more immersive than simply hitting an invisible wall, staring at the character's walk cycle repeat in one place as they jog without actually moving.

You can get creative, too - Spore memorably has your poor little alien eaten by a sea monster if you swim too far out, while Prototype launches an infinite stream of knockback missiles at you if you fly or swim too far from Manhattan. Different Walking Speeds For NPCs We were this close to adding "escort missions", but unlike the other examples in this list we could actually think of some inoffensive examples of them - so instead, let's take one of the mechanics that can make an escort mission an utter pain. The Assassin's Creed series is a notable offender of this issue.

Few things are more annoying than NPCs having a walking speed that is faster than your walking speed, but slower than your running speed. This way you'll spend the entire mission awkwardly jogging a few steps, then walking a few, then jogging again like some Ministry of Silly Walks reject. Annoying Checkpoint Placement Breaking the flow is a major pet peeve of ours, and poor checkpoint placement is the epitome of this problem. Difficulty can be great in games, throwing yourself at an impasse until you finally find the solution can make for the most memorable gaming moments.

Having to trudge through the same lengthy, but not challenging portion of game because the checkpoint was placed an hour of progress back is less memorable, and more of a deal breaker. Lives Lives are an inseparable, classic conceit of the video game medium that have become a universally recognized symbol - at this point, everyone knows phrases like "one up" even if they've never touched a game controller in their life.

However, they're also an outdated system reaching back to the Arcade era designed to rob teenagers from their quarters, and really have no justifiable place in video games these days, unless it is a deliberately retro title evoking that era. There are better ways to add difficulty and represent character "health".

What game mechanics would you prefer to never see in a title again?