
Religious and otherwise spiritual debate has existed since the first god was conceptualized. You may disagree on a few of my points but I hope that does not dissuade some of my more "religiously cautious" readers. I will not be offended if you skim over certain parts.
----------
I believe everyone has a right to their own version of spiritualism as long as they do not expect others to share the same view. When religious believe is forced on others and used as a means of separating people, then it has overall lost its enlightenment benefits. One need not be reminded that no matter how we may wish it, we can not make a blind man see. It is my personal opinion that agnosticism is the wisest choice of spirituality because no one can definitively prove how existence started.
I see strong devotion to any idea or cause as a blight upon the progress of intellectual thought. Throughout history, religion is often used as an instrument for classifying people into superior and inferior groups based solely on their beliefs. Persecution commonly escalates to something more: violence, utter disregard or even worse, thereby exacerbating the original injustice that was the criminalization of self.
The two most popular theories for how we came to exist are the theory of "Intelligent Design" and the "Big Bang." In the former, an all powerful being created the universe at will. In the latter, a tiny little ball containing all the matter of the universe exploded. In both theories, one must challenge the details. How long did either of them exist before "existence?" Who created an all powerful being? Where did the tiny ball containing all matter come from? What triggered either one to suddenly create the universe? No one can answer those questions conclusively because no one was present to witness the beginning of existence. This is why the debate has continued for so long.
Science no one fully understands cannot disprove mythology based on what may honestly be little...